Showing posts with label Granderson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Granderson. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

AL Playoff Preview and Awards Predictions

With the Yankees’ victory over the Blue Jays yesterday, the field is pretty much set in the AL for the playoffs. All four teams are locked in and are now getting their rotations set for their upcoming series starting next week.

So who’s going to represent the AL in the World Series this year? Let’s break it down!

*Note – I’m going under the assumption that the Yankees are more interested in facing the Twins in the first round than winning the division. Since it’s nearly impossible that the Rangers could catch the Twins in terms of record, I’m setting the playoff matchups as: Yankees-Twins and Rangers-Rays.

New York Yankees vs. Minnesota Twins – There are going to be two storylines for this matchup: Can the Twins finally overcome the Yankees, who won the season series this year 4-2 and absolutely owned them the past several years (16-50 since 2002 when Ron Gardenhire was named manager)? And who’s going to win a game for the Yanks besides CC Sabathia and Andy Pettitte?

The upside for the Twins is that they have been a monster in the second half this year, going 46-21 since the All-Star break, and both their series against the Yankees came in May, when they were not playing nearly as well as they are now. They have a top-flight ace in Francisco Liriano (14-9, 3.48 ERA, 195 K’s, 1.26 WHIP), and their lineup has really stepped up since Justin Morneau went down with a concussion that he can’t shake the side effects.

The downside is… This is still the same Yankee team that rang them up 3-0 last postseason, except Kerry Wood is a better bridge to Mariano Rivera (Wood’s ERA since becoming a Yankee – 0.39, not to mention more than a strikeout per inning pitched and BAA of .167). Robinson Cano has blossomed into a possible MVP winner and the lineup is still one of the best in baseball.

The big question mark for the Yankees is starting pitching. Behind Sabathia, Andy Pettitte has basically used the month of September as a second spring training, Javier Vazquez is now a reliever and AJ Burnett might be too bad to be a reliever. Phil Hughes, while having a solid season, is still a postseason unknown and unlikely to get a start in the ALDS.

I gotta give the edge to the Yankees here. Sabathia should outduel Liriano, and the Yankees should score enough runs to move on to the next round. Let’s say Yankees in four.

Texas Rangers vs. Tampa Bay Rays – Having seen a lot of the Rays this year, they are quite a misleading team. Dangerous offensively… but they got no-hit or one-hit on five occasions this year. Excellent starting pitching… which has struggled of late besides Cy Young hopeful David Price. Best 8th and 9th inning tandem all year… but if the starting pitching doesn’t get through 7, the rest of the bullpen can be had.

That said, I don’t think the Rangers have the starting pitching to make the Rays pay for their lack of offense. Add in the fact that the Rays just swept the Rangers in August… in a series where they beat Cliff Lee, and before Josh Hamilton went on the DL with broken ribs.

Even if he plays, a month off for a .361 hitter like Hamilton is still a month off. Add in the fact that Neftali Feliz, while dominating at times, has struggled at times, and I say the Rays win in four.

ALCS: Yankees vs. Rays – The season series went 10-8 in favor of Tampa. AJ Burnett will have to start a game in this series. Then again, so does Matt Garza, who has not been the same pitcher since his no-hitter. The Rays’ lineup has done well this year against the Yankees’ starters… but the postseason is another beast entirely.

This is a really tough call to make here. I’ve gotta say though, that David Price beating CC Sabathia heads up in back-to-back September starts is going to be a taste of things to come. Rays in seven.

AL Award Winners!

AL MVP – Alongside Detroit’s record falling off a cliff is Miguel Cabrera’s MVP chances. He’ll still pull some 1st place votes, thanks to his sick Triple Crown categories (.328 BA, 38 HR, 126 RBI’s). But with two candidates from first place teams having excellent years as well, I don’t see the voters giving it to a team that may finish around .500 and in third place.

Robinson Cano is the next leading candidate, and he’s getting a ton of love for being the Yankees’ offensive force early on in the season. The big question is: Did he peak too early? Everyone points to his batting average dropping from his April high of .400 to .276 in July, but let’s keep in mind: His other numbers stay very similar month-to-month, he’s played a Gold-Glove caliber second base and will have only missed one game all year if he plays out the last weekend in Boston.

Josh Hamilton is the last candidate, and the American League batting champion (.361) also has 31 HR and 97 RBI’s, which got his team out to the largest lead entering September in any division in the majors. Then, he broke his ribs crashing into a wall, and has barely been seen since. He should be back in time for the playoffs – nor should anyone expect him to miss the playoffs for any reason – but was a September off enough to swing the vote away from him?

Your AL MVP – Robinson Cano, slightly edging Josh Hamilton. Games played and the defense will swing the vote.

AL Cy Young – If I have to hear Michael Kay bitch to anyone else about how you can’t give the Cy Young to a pitcher with only 13 wins, I will smack him with a book of binary code… or Felix Hernandez’ run support in his starts. (FYI, binary code is a series of 0’s and 1’s)

Throw out 13-12 for just a second. He leads the AL in innings pitched (249.2 and counting), ERA (2.27), strikeouts (232), and complete games (6). He’s only had four – FOUR! – starts where he gave up more than three runs. He’s had 12 starts where the Mariners scored 2 runs or fewer in that start. He went 5-1 against the AL East, and has more wins against winning teams than CC Sabathia. He’s only had 2 starts in which he didn’t go 6 innings.

Look, to be fair, CC Sabathia has had a great year. So has David Price and Jon Lester, who should all get some votes.

Just not first-place votes.

Your AL Cy Young Winner – Felix Hernandez. However, I am thoroughly prepared to be wrong, since I have a feeling most voters will be blinded by Sabathia’s 21 wins.

AL Rookie of the Year – This is basically a two-horse race between Austin Jackson of the Tigers and Neftali Feliz of the Rangers. I’ve gone through Jackson’s numbers for the year here - A Grand Move, or a Grand Mistake?. Feliz however did just set the rookie record for most saves in a season with 38, and has a 2.81 ERA, 0.89 WHIP and strikes out more than a batter an inning.

Basically, if Feliz’ ERA was still above 3 like it was through August, I would give it to Jackson. But, given the historical nature of the season, and the fact that he closed out games for a division winner, and the answer’s simple.

Your AL Rookie of the Year – Neftali Feliz, making it two straight years for closers winning the award (Andrew Bailey, the closer for the A’s won last year’s).

Once the playoff picture is a little clearer I’ll be back with my NL Postseason picks and award winners. Sound off in the comment section below and stay tuned!

~ David

Saturday, September 25, 2010

A Grand Move, or a Grand Mistake?

I sit around a bunch of baseball fans at my job, and during work or breaks we'll talk
baseball. The other day, the Mets fan of the group mentioned how Curtis Granderson was
starting to come through for the Yankees (this was the night after he hit two homers
against the Rays). The three Yankee fans (including myself) were pretty ambivalent
about this declaration, and the ensuing debate led to this question I had:

Now that the season is winding down, was the Curtis Granderson trade a good move for the
Yankees?

Now, based on the eyeball test for the season, my gut instinct was to say no. However, I
wanted to make sure that my eyes weren't lying to me. So, I dug into it, and I came to this
conclusion:

The only way it was worth it is if the Yankees win the World Series and Granderson has a
Brosius-in-'99 postseason.

When looking at the trade, there are several factors to consider:
1. Is Granderson an upgrade over Austin Jackson?
2. Is Granderson an upgrade over Johnny Damon?
3. Was the overall value in the package given up for Granderson matched by his production?
4. What did the Granderson move prevent the Yankees from doing/force them to do?

Let's start with the first question: Is Granderson an upgrade over Austin Jackson?

Granderson
SPLITS G    AB  R    H  2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 127 436 71 108 17   6   21   60 49 105 12   2    .248 .325 .459 .784

Jackson
SPLITS G    AB   R     H    2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 142 578 99   172   32 10    4   37   45 160 25    5   298 .352 .408 .760

This point makes the biggest case for making the Granderson trade. His power numbers are
significantly better, as are his RBI totals and his strikeout totals aren't nearly as bad.
Also to continue the point, it can be fairly stated that Jackson probably duplicates most
of what the Yankees got this year from Brett Gardner:

Gardner
SPLITS G    AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 143 451 90 125 19 6     5   46 75    95 42    8 .277   .384 .379 .763

It's also safe to say that, given his better OBP and lower strikeout numbers compared to
Jackson's, that Gardner was a better fit in the Yankee lineup this year. And given the
dearth of power across baseball this year, where Jose Bautista might be the only 50 HR
hitter, you could give added value to the rarer commodity that Granderson provided over
Jackson, namely home run power.

For this point, I would say that Granderson, for this lineup, was an upgrade over Austin
Jackson as an everyday player.

2. Is Granderson an upgrade over Johnny Damon?

Granderson
SPLITS G    AB  R    H  2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 127 436 71 108 17   6   21   60 49 105 12   2    .248 .325 .459 .784

Damon
SPLITS G    AB   R   H  2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 135 505 79 135 33   5    8   48  67  86   10 1    .267 .355 .400 .755

This point, believe it or not, is a little murkier, and really ties into the last two
questions. Damon was actually a significantly better hitter at home (higher average, only
1 HR on the road), which was not much different from last year, when he was a catalyst for
a World Series champion. He gets on base more, walks more, strikes out less, and was a
known commodity, even if he's only a DH at this point.

That leads me to the point that probably clinches it for replacing Damon with Granderson:
You don't have to cringe when writing Granderson into your outfield lineup on a given
night. Plus, leading back to the same point from above, HR hitters have extra value this
year over most hitters, and Granderson has actually pretty even home and road HR numbers
(12 at home, 9 on the road).

So let's call it for Granderson on this point too.

Here's where it gets trickier, and requires a little more speculation:

3. Was the overall value of the package given up for Granderson matched by his production?

This has to be a resounding no. Even giving extra value to his HR total, you're still
talking about an above-average centerfielder who hit for a low average, didn't walk a lot
to compensate for his low average, struck out a lot and didn't steal many bases.

Remember, in return for Granderson, the Yankees had to give up not only Austin Jackson,
but also Phil Coke, a serviceable young bullpen arm, and Ian Kennedy, who was one of
three untouchables for Arizona at the trade deadline.

Kennedy
SPLITS G GS CG SHO IP      H   R ER HR BB SO W L P/GS WHIP BAA ERA
Season 30 30 0       0   185.0 155 83 78 25   66 161 9 9   99.8   1.19 .228    3.79

Now, you could also say that Kennedy has nowhere near those numbers if the Yankees hold
onto him. But, you could also say that he would have had a good amount of time to pitch in
the minors and make spot starts, which would have served the purpose of enhancing his
trade value.

Let's bring the last question into play:

4. What did the Granderson move prevent the Yankees from doing/force them into doing?

Two names for what the Yankees were forced to do: Nick Johnson (remember him?) and Javier
Vazquez.

Vazquez
SPLITS G GS CG SHO IP      H   R  ER HR BB SO W L P/GS WHIP  BAA    ERA
Season 29 25  0      0   149.2 144 87 84  29  61  118 10 9 96.2   1.37    .252    5.05

Vazquez had his off-year, in his on-year/off-year career, in a contract year, when he was supposed to solidify the Yankee rotation behind Sabathia, Pettitte and Burnett. Now, I'll admit I didn't hate the Vazquez move after the Granderson trade, because the Yankees had taken themselves out of the running for Halladay, and apparently only Seattle was aware that Cliff Lee was available.

That brings me to my second point: The Yankees had to make the Vazquez and Johnson moves, since they no longer had an outfield spot for Damon and he didn't want to DH full-time at the time, and they didn't have the prospects to get a better pitcher like a Halladay or Lee.

This stings in two different ways, or should I say the same way two different times. The Yankees were never in the running for Lee during the winter, and probably get him if they have a package with Austin Jackson and Jesus Montero during June, when the Rangers swiped him away.

(I won't include Halladay in this argument necessarily, even if the Blue Jays probably do better with Kennedy, Jackson and Montero than the package they got from the Phillies. They didn't seem to be interested enough.)

Also, with Nick Swisher having a career year in right, what does this mean for the Yankee outfield going forward? Gardner is a very unique presence in that lineup in terms of his OBP plus his speed, as well as being a good defensive outfielder. Swisher's not going anywhere, between his switch-hitting ability, HR power and overall effect on the clubhouse. And now you have Granderson who almost has to play next year due to his salary and the Yankees now having a budget that they feel the need to stick to.

Does Granderson prevent them from making the big offer to Carl Crawford that they probably should make (even if my opinion is that he's not going to be a Yankee)? Does it take them out of the trade market if an upgrade becomes available?

All in all, it just doesn't seem to add up. You'd have to think that the Yankees offense would've continued to chug along with a .300+ hitter with speed instead of a .250 hitter with power. Combine that with the fact that Damon would've given future flexibility since he could've been had for 1 year later on in free agency, and you probably don't see Nick Johnson as a Yankee, the power upgrade was not worth it.

Give me trade and payroll flexibility over Curtis Granderson.

Unless he tears up this postseason. Then I take it all back.

~ David